Plurality of information

Never before, since one can remember, the media have been so partisan. Viewed from the side, can boast of pluralism. From an opposing view is that instead of indoctrination received information today.

The growing phenomenon occurs in all media supports. The latest TV channels, for example, occupy the ideological ends of the arc: first, the Sixth and Channel Four, on the other, Intereconomía and Liberty Digital. That, in principle, is neither good nor bad, it just is.

Not to mention the press, with the two youngest journals also lean more on the doctrinal spectrum: Public and The Gazette. The major drawback of this reality is unique readers or listeners-half of a single issuer or viewers of television one-have the perception of living in a country other than its neighbor, which, if not corrected in time through greater diversification of sources of information, from the paranoia can lead to confrontation neighborhood.

This schizophrenic situation increases the proliferation of digital media, one of his father and others of his mother, as is legitimate. Not to mention public television, more aware in general of the watchwords of the autonomous government of the day that news in itself: if someone wants to know what is happening in your community, it may be, you'd better connect a channel While geographically distant.

The strange thing is that these facts are there before our eyes, but journalists never dare to publicly reflect on them.