Bloody Pixels

Never open a news positive news, it is generally always choose some bloody question, I know it is well known that blood sells well, but also desensitizes the receiver of the information, the blood always appears to the lunch or dinner so if one is sensitive just to change the channel. At the end of blood you get used to like to hear about dismemberment, murder and other events that populate much of the news. It seems that the more wild and violent is the fact more and more impact has recreated the chroniclers, which makes the end people become saturated quickly. Reports have lost a little north of a time now highlighting only the negative part of society.

They say what does not sell anything positive, which is not true but what is more striking morbid and unpleasant. A newscast with some science and less blood I am convinced that it would be a novelty and even much discussed. Asking that is like, think that if you talk about books on TV people will devote to nap, do not have to be like but it is a very widespread. The bad news seem to guarantee an audience many experts say the brainy as people are morbid nature. Those who do not like the blood on the news, we often pay attention to the football section (formerly called sports). The funny thing is that it always opens with something unpleasant may be preparing for the viewer to a hard drink. Perhaps this will change someday but for now we have blood for a while. The morbid moves our emotions to the TV, and someone once told me "a news article with more impact dead without them?. Honestly some time to change the television and radio to inform me I do not regret the change, the word creates less discomfort than the image.

I guess a century of these our customs when to report changes and we swallow everything that we want to sell blood included. Meanwhile all the same news repeated a thousand times for having thousands of resources lead to more variety. The blood will continue monopolizing the TV and some continue to far from it.